🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a law lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," said one MEP supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, additional states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.